Your cart is currently empty!

Steven Coulson
Steven has been drinking beers, wines and spirits for decades and has a propensity to go about them at length after a few drinks.
Latest Posts
- 57/m: Love beer, but it doesn’t love me as much anymore
- No Stupid Questions Wednesday – ask anything about beer
- Does anyone else get treated like a beer snob for ordering literally anything that isn’t a macro lager?
- Is there a polite way to refuse a beer that’s being served in the wrong glassware without making everyone at the table uncomfortable?
- # What’s the most pretentious thing you’ve ever said about beer that you secretly didn’t understand yourself?
Categories
Tags
Social Links

Exploring the Health Implications of Non-Alcoholic Beer: Is It Truly Harmful?
In recent discussions about alcohol consumption, a phrase has become quite prevalent: “Any amount of alcohol is harmful to the body.” This raises an interesting question regarding non-alcoholic beer, which typically contains a trace amount of alcohol—often less than 0.5%. If alcohol, in any quantity, poses risks, should we be concerned about these low-alcohol options?
As someone who abstains from alcohol but has recently ventured into the realm of non-alcoholic beers, I find the taste quite enjoyable. However, the consensus about the health implications of even trace amounts of alcohol is puzzling. If the prevailing belief is that any level of alcohol consumption can be detrimental, do these non-alcoholic beverages fall into the same category of concern?
This leads to a broader inquiry: Is the statement “any amount of alcohol is bad for you” an exaggeration? Do we need to reassess how we view the safety of non-alcoholic beers?
I invite readers to share their insights on the matter. Is non-alcoholic beer genuinely a healthier alternative, or might it still carry certain health repercussions? Let’s engage in a thoughtful discussion to unravel this topic further.